No. Title Date
1 Aid and Recovery in Post-Earthquake Nepal : Independent impacts and recovery monitoring phase 3, qualitative field monitoring, September 2016
2 Aid and Recovery in Post-Earthquake Nepal : Independent impacts and recovery monitoring phase 2 quantitative survey, February and March 2016 (summary)
3 Aid and Recovery in Post-Earthquake Nepal : Independent impacts and recovery monitoring phase 2 qualitative field monitoring, February and March 2016 (summary)
4 Aid and Recovery in Post-Earthquake Nepal : Independent impacts and recovery monitoring phase 1, June 2015 (synthesis report executive summary)
5 Aid and Recovery in Post-Earthquake Nepal : Independent impacts and recovery monitoring phase 1 quantitative survey, June 2015 (executive summary)
6 The chess players
7 Choice is yours : Short-term Panchayat-era nationalism or long-term vision of Nepal owned by all?
8 Class-conscious earthquake : State and society will come together for national reconstruction, other must support
9 Climate change policy : New hope
10 Collection of assorted press cuttings on Plaatje's death, obituaries etc.
11 Crude measure
12 Dodging questions : Party’s indecisiveness on delineation and naming of provinces could prove costly
13 Heart of the matter, part 2 : In marginalized communities, access to power makes all the difference
14 In between disasters : Sushil Koirala's term as Prime Minister will be remembered as one of inaction in the face of adversity
15 Kina?
16 Local or national government : Let us get to the bottom of why some favour cheating the citizenry of participatory local democracy
17 Lose the yam : Nationalist elite would do well to reflect on the true meaning of sovereignty
18 Maoist leaders' kin off to China as quake victims! : Even those from districts not hit by quake included in the team
19 New deal : Good beginning but a lot more need to be done to fill gaps in the 16-point deal
20 No easy way out : We cannot be ‘doing feminism’ without addressing questions of racism and heterosexism within the citizenship debate