Your search within this document for 'Heritage' OR 'tangible' resulted in nine matching pages.

You can restrict your results by searching for Heritage AND tangible.
1

“...ResearchGate See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318272666 Architectural considerations in restoration of heritage buildings damaged by earthquake Article in Disaster Advances • January 2017 CITATIONS 0 READS 101 1 author: Anjali Sharma National Institute of Technology Patna 2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Project Architecture View project All content following this page was uploaded by Anjali Sharma on 20 July 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file....”
2

“...July (2017) Architectural considerations in restoration of heritage buildings damaged by earthquake Sharma Anjali Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology Patna, Ashok Raj path, Patna, Bihar 800005, INDIA anj alisharma@nitp. ac .in Abstract This study explores architectural considerations necessary for restoration of heritage buildings damaged by earthquakes in the wake of damage to Kathmandu’s Dharhara tower in the 2015 Nepal earthquake, through case studies of six selected historical buildings in Patna that were damaged by earthquake(s) and were subsequently repaired and/or restored. Based on the case studies, it was found that (1) the very features imparting monumental status to buildings are the ones most vulnerable during earthquakes; (2) every heritage building has a soul which should not be muzzled - restoration must ensure preservation of the soul of the building to protect its architectural and heritage value; (3) tourism potential and ensuing commercial value...”
3

“...legacy of buildings. However, located in zone IV - a high damage risk zone -Patna is prone to earthquakes. Seismic events in the past have caused moderate to severe damage to many of its heritage buildings. The Bihar earthquake of 1934 was one of the worst earthquakes in India’s history that caused severe damages to many buildings in Patna which were subsequently repaired while a few required restorations. Through detailed case studies of six selected heritage buildings of Patna, this study is an attempt to (1) highlight the nature and extent of damages suffered by these buildings in different earthquakes and (2) analyze the appropriateness of restorations done. Based on the findings of the case studies and review of related literature, this study will explore architectural considerations in restoring heritage buildings damaged by earthquakes and will recommend the course of action for the Dharhara Tower. Material and Methods Data and information was collected through both primary and secondary...”
4

“...Ownership also has an impact on die quality of restoration as there appears to be a compromise on not only its architectural character and heritage value but also die structural strength and stability as a whole. (5) Regular maintenance, repair and adaptive reuse: Heritage monuments such as die administrative building of NIT Patna, that are under continued use where regular maintenance and repair is ensured, have demonstrated resilience and longevity.20 Continued use of buildings improves its structural health and stability, enhances longevity and amounts to preservation.20 On die other hand, poor maintenance of buildings, inadequate funding, loss of technical knowledge and lack of social valuation are among the causes which when combined with a destructive natural event such as an earthquake, generate a significant impact in the amount and quality of heritage buildings.23 This aspect is particularly significant in Gol Ghar which was designed as a granary but was never used. This 230-year-old...”
5

“...Disaster A dvances Vol. 10 (7) July (2017) Table 1 Largest measured earthquakes in Bihar Place Date Magnitude Epicentre Eastern Nepal33 26.8.1833 7.9 ±0.1 27.500° N, 86.500° E Bihar-Bengal area34 11.11.1842 Maximum intensity IX 27.000° N, 88.300° E Bihar-Nepal border 15.1.1934 8.4 26.500° N, 86.500° E Udaypur Gahri, Nepal 20.8.1988 6.8 26.755° N, 86.616° E Lamjung, Nepal 25.4. 2015 7.9 28.147° N, 84.708° E Aftershock of Nepal earthquake 12.5.2015 7.3 27.837° N, 86.077° E Table 2 Selected Heritage Buildings taken-up for case study S.N. Name Constructed in Managed by Architectural Style Damaged on Extent of Damage 1. Sher Shahi Mosque 1541-45 WAQF Board Afghan Style 15.1.1934 Collapse of 4 small domes 2. Gol Ghar 1786 Govt, of Bihar Stupa style Several Cracks in dome 3. NIT Patna 1898-1902 NIT Patna Indo-saracenic revival 12.5.2015 Fine cracks in arches 4. Secretariat 1913-15 Govt, of Bihar Stripped neoclassical 15.1.1934, 20.8.1988 Collapse of Tower 5. Patna High Court 1913-16 Govt, of Bihar...”
6

“...1940s (Source: photodivision.gov.in) Fig. 8: Administrative building of NIT Patna (Courtesy: Abdul Asrarr R.S.) Ticketing such shows will generate revenue and ensure its maintenance and repair on regular basis. The use of jute, rotten jaggery and katha for the internal finish during renovation, is exemplary since it will make the interiors acoustically sound and conducive for such shows. Discussion Historical monuments present the most tangible legacy of our past and often, they are rich source of archaeological information. Such rich sources of heritage warrant a certain degree of care especially when restoring following damage due to destructive natural events such as earthquakes. Based on the outcome of the cases studied and review of extensive literature, an attempt has been made to explore considerations that are important from an architectural point of view in restoration of buildings damaged by earthquake. Earthquakes have been a menace to buildings ever since man began to construct...”
7

“...surviving example of a particular architectural style in a city of a region or it may be significant because of its excellence artistic merits or uniqueness of its design, compositions, craftsmanship, details etc. The building might have been designed by an Architect/Engineer or other design professional or constructed by a builder whose work is of local, regional or national importance. It is also important to respect the idea of the original builder. Since historical monuments provide the most tangible legacy of our past and at times, they are the more informative than any other form of archaeological remains, it is therefore, imperative to ensure that restoration of damaged buildings must not alter their architectural character, since it may lead to the loss of such information. An example of appropriate restoration of a building is the Hagia Sophia at Istanbul, Turkey located on the Anatolian plate - the zone of collision between Eurasian, African and Arabian plate which is a seismically...”
8

“...Disaster A chances Vol. 10 (7) July (2017) strengthening of various structures. However, it is up to the architect and structural engineer to decide upon the most appropriate one that will be most suitable considering other local conditions. Familiarity with the latest researches in relation to structural strengthening of heritage buildings, particularly related to architectural elements (both structural and non-structural) is crucial for deciding upon the most appropriate technique for structural strengthening in a particular element. Necessity of proper supervision and inspection: It is a well-established fact that even the most perfect of structural designs can be flawed if it is not executed properly. Therefore, meticulous supervision of construction works must be done by professional architects and engineers on regular basis along with frequent inspections to ensure that all relevant codes are followed and to ensure materials and workmanship for ensuring its strength and stability...”
9

“... Engineering, 35-41 (2015) 21. Sonda D., Cossu M., Miyamoto H.K and Shah S.D., Methodology for Seismic Improvement of Ancient Heritage Monuments in India, The Masterbuilder, 4-10 (2015) 22. Kelley S.J., Sendova V. and Gavrilovic P., Seismic Protection of Byzantine Churches, 1-9 (1995) 23. Loustalot B.D., Beyond the appearance of heritage: Reconstruction of Historic Areas Affected by Earthquakes in Chile, International Journal of Architectural Research, I, 24-39 (2013) 24. Mohandas K.P., Strengthening and Restoration of Heritage Buildings, In Seminar on Conservation of Heritage Buildings/Precints in Chennai Metropolitan Area (2010) 25. Lattig J.W., Calamities, Catastrophes and Cataclysms: Current Trends in International Disaster Risk Management Practices for Cultural Heritage Sites, University of Pennsylvania (2012) 26. CPWD, Handbook of Conservation of Heritage Buildings, (2013) 27. Griler K., Saglamer A., Celep Z. and Pakdamar F., Structural and earthquake response analysis of the Little...”