Your search within this document for 'Economic' OR 'impacts' resulted in six matching pages.

You can restrict your results by searching for Economic AND impacts.
1 Page 3

“...Revitalizing Meyer Fortes' classic discussions of amity and the development cycle, I introduce the stories of three informants who attempt to maintain the virtues of kinship in spite of the financial pressures they bear. I also explore how their actions reflect a reckoning between legal ownership and everyday household ownership practices - a reckoning that has affected how household members interact, often in unpredictable ways. Keywords: kinship, informal economy, land tenure, disaster research, economic anthropology. HIMALAYA Volume37,Number2 65...”
2 Page 4

“...these three stories for the way they draw attention to how household members manage kin social- ity and finance through the careful management of time, and how the earthquake has interrupted this process. I revisit Meyer Fortes’ theorizations of amity, time and household development to argue that household recon- struction should be seen as a moral project, an attempt to actualize the virtues of kinship by engaging with economic systems. My research was based in Kathmandu and a town in Rasuwa with close economic ties to the capital - both places where these household economic systems are often formalized. Thus, I argue that these stories can be viewed as attempts by their protagonists to embed kinship virtues within the rationalized worlds of state and private bureau- cracy. I conclude by questioning how these attempts might be changing our existing understandings of kinship in post-earthquake Nepal. Amity and Time To what ends do households plan their financial futures? What are they hoping...”
3 Page 5

“...of factors and events outside of what is generally thought of as the household’s physical interior. In urban areas, such as Kathmandu, and even in the town in Rasuwa I frequented, these other factors can include tuition fees for private or public schools, land purchases within a chaotic market, loan payments, hosting regular feasts for extended kin, and remittances sent from family members working abroad. All these events work along regular or semi-regular timeframes, each constitut- ing an economic cycle of its own that must be brought into sync. From this perspective, the earthquake can be viewed as a massive interruption to the temporalities that households must manage. Given that the house is often the central asset of a Nepali family as well as the spatial nexus for its organization and sociality, its destruction has created a cascading effect as household members struggle to reor- ganize their lives in order to rebuild. Practically speaking, this has meant taking out bank loans, paying...”
4 Page 10

“...not her own, earning NRs 5-6,000 a month, while her husband did not seem to contribute any financial help to her household. Several years before the earthquake she had a job working as a seamstress for a local cooperative, but had to quit that job when her mother became sick with cancer. Her mother died before the earthquake, by which point Sapana’s finances were depleted. Now she had only NRs 5,000 in an account at a cooperative. Her daughter had a volunteer job at an NGO dedicated to women’s economic and social empowerment, volunteering as a teacher in rural areas south of the city. The daughter was given a stipend of NRs 8,000 each year, though more importantly the NGO had promised to cover her expenses should she decided to study in North America. However, Sapana was unable to cover the remaining expenses, and so her daugh- ter was not able to take advantage of this opportunity. By Sapana’s own calculation, reconstruction would cost her over NRs 2,500,000—far more than she could afford...”
5 Page 11

“...case of Sapana, however, no such tipping has occurred. Rather, despite having won her case, and despite having the land deed to her name, she remains unable to exercise her legal right in regards to her property, due primarily to the local- ized actions of her relatives. Local actors’ ability to thwart legal ruling—even in Kathmandu—has been well established (e.g. Pradhan 2007). It is interesting, however, that this assertion of localized authority should occur as part of a failure of household economic planning. Part of the shift in favor of bureau- cratic authority has been due to the necessity to engage bureaucratic processes and their contingent temporalities in order to create a coherent financial future. In the case of Sapana, this has meant capitalizing on her legal right to dispose of her land in the present. Her failure to do so—or one could say her opponents’ continuing success in stopping her—reflects the extent to which the successful engagement of bureaucracy remains dependent...”
6 Page 12

“...Andrew Haxby is a PhD Candidate in the anthropology department at the University of Michigan. He is a past Fulbright scholar to Kathmandu, and holds an MFA in creative writing from the New School. His area of interests include: economic anthropology, debt, shamanism, Christianity, semiotics and ethics. The author thanks the University of Michigan, the Wenner Gren Foundation, and the National Science Foundation for their support, without which this research would not have been possible. The author also thanks his advisors, Tom Fricke, Stuart Kirsch, and Matthew Hull, for their guidance on this project and on this article. Endnotes 1. Both gold and stocks can also be used as collateral, though few people own enough of either to collateralize large loans. For land, according to government regulation a borrower can receive loans no larger than 60-66% of the collateral’s fair market value. 2. See (Desjarlais 2016: 7-16) for full discussion of the term ‘fashioning.’ 3. There are close ties between...”